Tuesday, 22 October 2013

The CoCa-CoLa Company

By Yap May Tin


INTRODUCTION 

Coca-Cola (Coke) is a carbonated soft drink product that being distributed worldwide by The Coca-Cola Company, in Atlanta. It is a registered trademark of The Coca-Cola Company in the United States since March 27, 1944 (The Coca-Cola Company, 2013). Originally, the Coca-Cola is invented as a patent medicine in the late 19th century by pharmacist John Pemberton. Later in year 1889, Coca-Cola was bought out by Asa Griggs Candler, a businessman with his marketing tactics, led Coke to its dominance of the world soft-drink market throughout the 20th century.

Since economic resources are scarce, these resources must be used efficiently by the company to generate the greatest benefit with limited resources. According to the Coca-Cola Company, resources like water has an impact towards their production. Now, they are utilizing the global system in an efficient way by reducing the amount of water it uses per liter of product produced, even as the level of production increases (Reduce the ratio of water use to produce more). They are allocating ground water, municipal water, rain water and others for the production. Furthermore, the company has to decide how the goods are being produced. In Brazil, the company had invested heavily in technology, production capacity and the sales force to maximize their level of production. Over the recent years, a trade-off such as employing more workers or investing more machines has been made. According to Sahota (2012) and Industry Today (2013), they had spent millions of money on the operation to enhance their production methods and moving forward expecting to create 10,000 new jobs in Mexico over the next five years.


Law of demand states that there is an inverse relationship between the price of a good and the quantity of the good demanded (Hubbard and O’brien, 2007). As shown in Figure 1, by holding everything else constant, when the price of coke falls, the quantity demanded will increase whereas when the price of coke rises, the quantity demanded will decrease





FACTORS AFFECTING QUANTITY DEMANDED OF COKE 

THE CHANGE IN PRICE OF RELATED GOODS


In this case, there are numerous substitution goods that are present in the market, such as Pepsi, a big competitor of Coke for many years (Yglesias, 2013).

Figure 2 illustrates that when the price of Coke increases from RM 2 to 3 while the price of PepsiCo remains unchanged, there is a reduction in the quantity demanded for Coke (Qd 1 to Qd 2). Figure 3 shows that if both Coke and PepsiCo are substitutes, the higher price charges for Coke will cause an increment in the demand for PepsiCo, as consumers are willing to purchase the other product to substitute and fulfill their needs with lower price.





FACTORS AFFECTING DEMAND OF COKE 

A. EXPECTATIONS OF FUTURE PRICE CHANGES
If the consumers become convinced that there will be a price increment of coke in three months later, the demand for coke will increase now. Demand curve for coke will shift rightward.

B. TASTE AND PREFERENCES
If the consumers have no taste or preference of coca cola, then if the price increases the demand decreases, consumer might go for Coke’s substitutes.  
According to Natural News (2013), Coca-Cola contains harmful levels of aspartame, pesticides and other chemicalsThese issues raise up the consumers’ health concern and might prefer more on  natural health drinks. The demand for Coca-Cola decreases.

C. TIME
 The demand for coca cola goes up during festive seasons and during summers or during events such as Olympics (Mickle, 2012), the demand and the sales boost up fast during these particular time.

D. AGE GROUP OF THE POPULATION
This product is meant for the children, adults and also for the old people so the age group does not much affect the demand of the product. Therefore the demand remains same and with the increase in the population, the demand of the product also increases.

FIGURE 4 IS FORMED BASED ON A TO D


Market Structure

According to Lee and Schweizer (2013), soft-drink market is dominated by two main firms: Coca-Cola and PepsiCo. They are oligopoly, the highest-profile competitors. Oligopoly formed when just a few firms between them and shares a huge proportion within the industry. Coca-Cola and PepsiCo are interdependent on each other before making any pricing decisions. 

CHARACTERISTICS OF OLIGOPOLY

1. Keeps barriers for new competitors to entrà maintain their position of dominance
Economies of large scale production, EOS

Since 1923, Coke had diverse into franchise model globally and this had encouraged Coke to grow rapidly over the 20th century while achieving the EOS. It is the situation whereby Coke increasing the scale of production leads to a lower cost per unit of output (Liu, 2009). Clearly, the company is getting increasing returns to scale (increased in input leads to huge increment on output) from its factors of production (Garrratt, Sloman and Wride, 2012). New entrants are deterred as huge initial cost is needed to start-up and they do not have a large volume of production to minimize costs as production increases.


Advertising

Coca-Cola had spent billions of money on advertising via print, radio, television and internet worldwide (Lovel, 2002 and McWilliams, 2011). This had boosted Coke as a strong brand. Advertising is another sunk cost - the more that is spent by incumbent firms the greater the deterrent to new entrants. 

A strong brand

According to The Library Congress (2013), Coke has a long history of heavy advertising and this has earned them huge amount of brand equity and loyal customers all over the world. This makes it virtually impossible for a new entrant to match this scale in this market place.


Exclusive contracts, patents and licences

These make entry difficult as they favor existing firms who have won the contracts or own the licenses. For example, contracts between suppliers and retailers can exclude other retailers from entering the market (Hubbard and O’brien, 2008).


2. Interdependence of Coke with its rivals à The firm is affected by rivals' behaviors 

  Strategy à To compete or collude, to raise, lower or keep price relatively constant


Non-collusive case
According to McGuinness (2012) and Mutegi (2013), Coca-Cola and Pepsi often competing to each other and the likelihood of price competition is high in order to gain a bigger share of industry profits for themselves.
 If Pepsi changes its price, Coca-Cola’s demand curve shifts. Thus, the way of determining the profit maximizing output is complicated.  Coke can decide on its best price and output, but then Pepsi will react and change its price or output.  That will shift Coke’s demand curve, changing its best strategy and so one and so on.
Kinked demand curve model theory à dual demand curve might happen in a firm for its product based on the likely reactions of other firms to a change in its price
According to Jackson, Mclver and Wilson (2008), two results derive from the kinked curve:


  • If a firm increases the prices, none of the rivals will keep the same price in order to gain customers from the first firm, the demand of the first firm may falls
  • If a firm cuts the prices, its rivals will be forced to follow to prevent losing out customers to the first firm


Based on the assumptions, Coke will face a demand curve that is kinked at the current price and output.

Marginal Revenue Curve

According to Case and Fair (2002), Coke’s marginal revenue curve associated with the kinked-demand curve contains three distinct segments as shown in Figure 6. 

  • Top Segment: MR corresponds to the elastic demand generated when price increases above RM 2 and for quantities less than 20,000 cans.
  • Bottom Segment: It’s the steep bottom portion of the marginal revenue and corresponds to the less elastic demand generated when price decreases below RM 2 and for quantities greater than 20,000 cans.
  • Middle Segment: The vertical middle segment connecting the top and bottom segments that occurs at the output quantity of 20,000 cans corresponds with the kink of the curve.



Profit are maximized when MC = MR. Hence, if the Marginal Cost Curve for coke lies between any point between MC 1 and MC2, profit maximizing output (20000) and price (RM 2) is achieved. (See figure 7)


Kinked demand theory creates a situation of price stability for Coke, as an oligopoly firm, might likely keep their price relatively constant  to achieve profit maximizing level as there is a resistance to a change of price (Garrratt, Sloman and Wride, 2012).


PRICE DISCRIMINATION 

Coca-Cola has introduced price discrimination (Business Week, 2003), by setting the price of goods at different prices to different customers whereby their production costs remain unchanged. According to Morran (2013) and Seward (2013), the price adjustment for Coca-Cola vending machines are based on the weather temperatures, a new technology and practiced in several countries like Spain.
For instance, in terms of time pricing, third-degree price discrimination is being practiced. Coca-Cola had tested on the vending machine that would raise prices during a hot day and lower prices when the weather is cool. Customers are placed intro different groups based on the weather conditions and charges at a different price.


By considering price discrimination, Coca-Cola is able to identify whether the discriminatory prices should impose and at what level of output should be produced (Garrratt, Sloman and Wride, 2012).


From (i), the demand is less elastic. However, due to the hotness of weather, customer might have greater utility while purchasing Coke to overcome thirsty issue.
From (ii) the demand is elastic since the price of Coke is lower, customers are willing to purchase more despite of the conditions of weather (Seward, 2013).
From (iii) whereby the MC=MR, with the output of 3000 and 6000 (9000 in total), Coke’s revenue would raise by RM 2 per unit sold, in each market.  Therefore, profit-maximizing output and prices are determined by using third-degree price discrimination.

_____________________________________________________________________

References

Business Week (2003) Sharper Tools for Discriminatory Pricing. Available from: http://www.businessweek.com/stories/2003-07-30/sharper-tools-fordiscriminatory-pricing [Accessed 20 October 2013].

Case, K. E. and Fair, R. C. (2002) Principles of Microeconomics. 10th ed. United States: Person Education.

Garratt, D., Sloman, J. and Wride, A. (2012) Economics. 8th ed. England: Pearson Education.

Hubbard, R. G. and O’brien, A. P (2008) Microeconomics. 2nd ed. United States: Pearson Education.

Industry Today (2013) COCA-COLA GUARARAPES. Available from: http://industrytoday.com/article_view.asp?ArticleID=FDQ_255[Accessed 18 October 2013].

Jackson, J., Mclver, R. and Wilson, E. (2008), Microeconomics. 9th ed. Australia: McGraw-Hill.

Lee, E. and Schweizer, K. (2013). Merger will bring Coke, Pepsi under one roof. Available from:http://www.vancouversun.com/business/Merger+will+bring+Coke+Pepsi+under+roof/8724782/story.html#ixzz2idmeDAHm [Accessed 22 October 2013].

Liu, C. H. (2009) Multinationals, Globalisation and Indigenous Firms in China [Online]. New York: Routledge. [Accessed 19 October 2013].

Lovel, J. (2002) Coke's ad spending up by $300 million in 2001. Available from:http://www.bizjournals.com/atlanta/stories/2002/03/18/newscolumn8.html?page=all [Accessed 20 October 2013].

McGuinness, R. (2012) Coca-Cola and Pepsi reignite rivalry on Twitter and Facebook. Available from:http://metro.co.uk/2012/05/08/coca-cola-and-pepsi-reignite-rivalry-on-twitter-and-facebook-418025/  [Accessed 22 October 2013].

McWilliams, J. (2011) Coca-Cola spent more than $2.9 billion on advertising in 2010. Available from:http://www.ajc.com/news/business/coca-cola-spent-more-than-29-billion-on-advertisin/nQq6X/  [Accessed 20 October 2013].

Mickle, T. (2012) Coke's London legacy: Higher sales. Available from:http://www.sportsbusinessdaily.com/Journal/Issues/2012/12/17/Marketing-and-Sponsorship/Coca-Cola.aspx [Accessed 20 October 2013].

Morran, C. (2013) Coca-Cola Tests Vending Machine That Changes Price Based On the Weather. Available from:http://consumerist.com/2013/10/10/coca-cola-tests-vending-machine-that-changes-price-based-on-the-weather/ [Accessed 23 October 2013].

Mutegi, M. (2013) Pepsi takes market share battle to Coca-Cola with a price cut. Available from:http://www.businessdailyafrica.com/Corporate-News/PepsiCo-cuts-its-prices-in--battle-with-Coca-Cola/-/539550/1694524/-/sfgkkyz/-/index.html [Accessed 20 October 2013].

Natural News (2013) Coke, Pepsi over harmful levels of aspartame, pesticides and other chemicals. Available from:http://www.naturalnews.com/019891_Pepsi_soft_drinks.html##ixzz2idnzA7cE  [Accessed 18 October 2013].

Sahota, D. (2012) Coca-Cola plans to invest $1 bn in Mexico in 2012. Available from: http://www.topnews.in/cocacola-plans-invest-1-bn-mexico-2012-2355303 [Accessed 18 October 2013].

Seward, C. (2013) Coca-Cola vending machine prices adjust with outdoor temperatures. Available from:http://www.ajc.com/weblogs/biz-beat/2013/oct/09/coca-cola-vending-machine-price-adjusts-outdoor-te/ [Accessed 23 October 2013].

The Coca-Cola Company (2013) Stories. Available from: http://www.coca-colacompany.com/stories/  [Accessed 10 October 2013].

The Library Congress (2013) Highlights in the History of Coca-Cola Television Advertising. Available from:http://memory.loc.gov/ammem/ccmphtml/colahist.html  [Accessed 20 October 2013].


3 comments:

  1. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Use this diet hack to drop 2 lb of fat in just 8 hours

    At least 160 000 men and women are utilizing a easy and secret "liquids hack" to burn 2 lbs every night as they sleep.

    It's scientific and it works with anybody.

    This is how to do it yourself:

    1) Get a clear glass and fill it up with water half full

    2) Now follow this amazing hack

    you'll become 2 lbs skinnier the next day!

    ReplyDelete